Legal Opinion

Lund v. Mission Insurance Company

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1974PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBryson, J.

Plaintiff-insured brought this declaratory judgment action to determine the scope of an uninsured motorist coverage endorsement in the automobile liability insurance policy issued to plaintiff’s husband by defendant. The policy named plaintiff as an insured. The case was tried to the court upon a written statement of facts and issues. The trial court made a general finding in favor of defendant and entered judgment accordingly. Plaintiff appeals.

On March 14,1971, plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile being driven by her spouse, David Lund. Floyd H. Gardner, the tort-feasor, rear-ended a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Porter v. Empire Fire and Marine Insurance CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Peterson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Detrick v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  4. Bowsher v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Kemp v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Stordahl v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Davis v. Government Employees InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Gorton v. Reliance Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  4. Palisbo v. Hawaiian Insurance & Guaranty Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Strunk v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API