Legal Opinion

DiMarco v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 23, 1936No. Appeals, Nos. 434 and 435PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

Plaintiffs secured a verdict in their action of trespass to recover damages for personal injuries to the minor. From the entry of judgments n. o. v. for defendant they have appealed.

Defendant’s right-of-way runs in a northeasterly direction as it intersects Wyoming Avenue near the intersection of that avenue with Tampa Street in the City of Philadelphia. There is a single track located in a cut approximately thirty feet deep. A small bridge carries Wyoming Avenue over the track below. Thé railroad’s property extends for an additional thirty-five feet from *570the top of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kay v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  2. Taylor v. Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  3. Schiffer v. Sauer Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  4. Francis v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  5. John v. Reick-Mcjunkin Dairy Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Onstott v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Noonan Et Ux. v. Pa. Railroad Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Franc v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Tarasovitch v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API