Legal Opinion

Loeffler v. Crandall

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 10, 1954No. 17142PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knauss

We will refer to the parties as they appeared in the trial court, where plaintiff in error was plaintiff, and defendant in error was defendant.

May 17, 1951 plaintiff was injured in a one car accident which occurred on U. S. Highway 96, about six miles east of Eads, Colorado. On January 5, 1952 she commenced her action against defendant seeking dam ages for personal injuries allegedly sustained in said accident. In her complaint plaintiff alleged she was a passenger in defendant’s automobile, and that defendant was guilty of negligence, consisting of willful and wanton disregard of the rights…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Millington v. HiedloffSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  2. Helgoth v. FoxhovenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
  3. Pupke v. PupkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pettingell v. MoedeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  2. Kennedy v. BaileySupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  3. Mears v. KovacicSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  4. Cook v. FariaNevada Supreme Court · 1957
  5. William H. Von Lackum, Jr. v. George R. Allan, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API