Legal Opinion

Mecklem v. Blake

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1862PublishedCited by 8 opinions

ERROR to the Circuit Court for Ozaukee County. The facts in this case are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Cole, J.

This was an action for a breach of a covenant of seizin. The form of the covenant was, that the defendant was “ well seized of the premises above described, as of a good, sure, perfect, absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance in fee simple,” &c. The complaint alleged that he was not so seized, and negatived the language of the deed. The defendant answered that be bad performed the covenants of bis deed, and that at the time of conveyance be was well seized, &c., following likewise the language of the deed. On the trial the question was raised as to which party…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ayres v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Woolley v. . NewcombeNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Ingalls v. EatonMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Noonan v. IlsleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Koepke v. WinterfieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API