Legal Opinion

In re the Accounting of Schlang

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided December 15, 1883Published

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoesen, J.

In the case of Halsy agt. Van Amring (6 Paige, 12) the chancellor did not deem it necessary to pass upon the question as to whether the court of chancery could disallow commissions where an executor or administrator had fraudulently mismanaged the estate, but he did decide that commissions could not be disallowed by a surrogate, who is an officer of limited powers, and who, to use the language of the chancellor,.“takes no power “by implication.” The duty of the surrogate is .to obey the statute, which requires him to allow to executors and administrators specified commissions for their…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Meacham v. SternesNew York Court of Chancery · 1842
  2. Halsey v. Van AmringeNew York Court of Chancery · 1836
  3. Dodge v. WilburNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  4. In re the Assignment of CoffinNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1879

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API