Legal Opinion

In re the Assignment of Coffin

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided June 15, 1879PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Accounting by an assignee under a general assignment for the benefit of creditors. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoesen, J.

No fault is found with the proceedings of the assignee until he attempted to make money for himself by his management of the assigned estate. He conceived the idea of inducing the creditors of Coffin & Lyon to release their claims against the assigned estate for less than the estate would have yielded to them on an honest administration; and to accomplish his purpose he addressed a circular letter to them, in which he stated that the law gave him seven months more time to settle the estate, and that it was for their interest to accept a final dividend of fifteen per cent, immediately, which…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Boyum v. JordanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. Manhattan Cloak & Suit Co. v. DodgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. In re the Accounting of SchlangNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1883
  4. In re the General Assignment of BostwickNew York Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API