Legal Opinion

Clinton H. Mitchell and Clinton Mitchell Foundation v. R. A. Riddell, District Director of Internal Revenue, and United States of America

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 1, 1969No. 22406PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JERTBERG, Circuit Judge:

Appellants, Clinton H. Mitchell and Clinton Mitchell Foundation (plaintiffs below), appeal from two orders of the District Court, one denying appellants’ motion for a summary judgment, and the other granting the motion of appellees for dismissal of the action for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter of the action.

On April 14, 1967, appellant, Clinton H. Mitchell, in pro per, filed a complaint in the district court, solely in his own name, against R. A. Riddell, a retired District Director of the Internal Revenue Service at Los Angeles. On August 25, 1967, on…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Minnesota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. United States v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Bob Jones University v. SimonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. James B. Stanley v. Central Intelligence Agency United States Department of Defense U.S. ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. The Church of the New Testament, Its Members and Friends, Plaintiffs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Church of Scientology of Hawaii v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  5. Pierson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1976

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API