Legal Opinion
Royal Court Realty Co. v. Thomas
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 19, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Malley, J.
The question to be decided is whether under an extension agreement of a mortgage the plaintiff was required to pay six per cent interest from the date of maturity to the time of payment of the principal, or but five per cent, the rate paid under the agreement to the date of maturity.
Defendants are the judicially-appointed trustees for the certificate holders under a bond and mortgage covering premises 2386 Ryer avenue, New York city, originally executed and delivered by the *314then owner, Danclare Holding Corporation, and running to Lawyers Mortgage Company.
When the mortgage company was placed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mayor, Etc., of New York v. . SonnebornNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Kress v. Central Trust CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Mortgage Commission v. FayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Mortgage Commission of the State of New York v. FayNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Zajic v. Sikora Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- 100 Eighth Ave. Corp. v. MorgensternNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Brighton Operating Corp. v. MorrisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Hammond v. Lawrence Investing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- In re Mortgage Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- Tiernan Realty Co. v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1941