MacArthur v. Dead River Company
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHIBALD, Justice.
The plaintiffs, Carol MacArthur and her two minor children, were seriously burned in a fire which destroyed an apartment house in which they were living in Woodland. The action against the defendants was premised on negligence. At the conclusion of the plaintiffs’ case the defendants moved for a directed verdict, which motion was granted. Subsequently the plaintiffs filed a motion for a new trial primarily because a subpoenaed witness failed to appear and it was claimed that her testimony, had it been available, would have established a basis for allowing the case to go to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hersum v. Kennebec Water DistrictSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955
- Boetsch v. Rockland JayceesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
3Cited by12 opinions
- Culbert v. Sampson's Supermarkets Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Holland v. SebunyaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Maine Real Estate Commission v. KelbySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
- Harrington v. Inhabitants of the Town of GarlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Atlantic Acoustical & Insulation Co. v. MoreiraSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.