McDermott, Will & Emery v. Potter (In re MEI Diversified Inc.)
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ALSOP, Senior District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court upon Plaintiffs appeal from the December 16,1994 order of United States Bankruptcy Judge Robert J. Kressel. In its Order, the Bankruptcy Court denied the Plaintiff’s request for compensation and reimbursement of expenses incurred in preparing its Second Interim and Final Fee Applications. The Plaintiff, McDermott, Will & Emery (“MW & E”), claims the Bankruptcy Court erred in failing to authorize reimbursement to MW & E for its fees and expenses, and abused its discretion by denying MW & E’s request for a telephonic hearing.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Supreme Court of NH v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- In Re Nucorp Energy, Inc., an Ohio Corporation, and Its Affiliates, Debtors. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & ScrippsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- In Re WildmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
- In Re James MATHIASON, Gladys Mathiason, Debtors. Mark C. HALVERSON, Trustee, Appellant, v. ESTATE OF Earl R. CAMERON, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- George H. Clay, Trustee and Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Traders Bank of Kansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.