Legal Opinion
United States v. Lexin
District Court, S.D. California
Decided May 22, 2006No. C 06 CR 0043 BENPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS LEXIN’S AND WEBSTER’S REQUESTS FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL; ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART COPLEY PRESS’ MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INTERVENTION (20-1); ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS LEXIN’S AND WEBSTER’S MOTION TO SEAL PERSONAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF REQUESTS FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL (24-1)
PAPAS, United States Magistrate Judge.
On January 6, 2006 five individuals formerly involved with the San Diego City Employees’ Retirement System (“SDCERS”) were indicted by a federal grand jury in the Southern District of California. Two of the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Joseph KonradCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- United States v. JenkinsDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2015
- Department of Social & Health Services v. ParvinWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- In re Dependency of M.H.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2015
- United States v. Joseph KonradCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.