Buchannan v. Cole
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the Lawrence Circuit Court. — Hon. W. M. Robinson, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtBiggs, J.
— The defendant Cole constructed for his. codefendant, the Davie Mining and Development Company, what is denominated a “gravity plant,” which is used for hoisting and separating lead and zinc ores. The plant consists of an engine, boiler, crusher, reels, jigs, rougher and finisher, shafting, pulleys, tanks, rods, etc., all inclosed by a building which was planned and constructed for that particular purpose. The plant was constructed on mining lots numbered 116, 117, 121 and 125, belonging to the Kentucky Mining Company. Cole employed the plaintiff to erect the building, for which he agreed to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Grace v. NesbittSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- Fratt v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Bradish v. JamesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- Richardson v. KochSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Hall v. St. Louis Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1886
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Springfield Foundry & Machine Co. v. ColeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- Drexel v. RichardsNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Cahill, Collins & Co. v. Orphan School of the Christian ChurchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895
- Rieser v. CommeauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Buchannan v. ColeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896