Legal Opinion
United States v. Anderson
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 8, 1983No. 82 Cr. 854 (RWS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION SWEET, District Judge.
At a pretrial conference held on May 27, 1983, counsel for defendant Sidney Anderson (“Anderson”) orally moved to suppress two statements made by Anderson. For the reasons stated below, the motion will be denied.
Anderson first seeks to suppress a tape recording made by a confidential informant without Anderson’s knowledge on April 16, 1982.' According to a transcript of the recording, the informant and Anderson were engaged in a conversation when the informant told Anderson that an associate, Michael Corbett (“Corbett”) “dropped a dime on” him, which apparently…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Sandy CheckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Lionel MohabirCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Thomas DUVALL and Henry Jones, Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Vincent Delillo, David Francis and Clearview Concrete Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. GalloDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986
- United States v. RastelliDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986
- Aviel v. GorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025