Legal Opinion

Lillywhite v. AECOM

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided December 23, 2020No. 2:18-cv-01840Unknown

1Opinion

THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 ERIC LILLYWHITE, CASE NO. C18-1840-JCC 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 AECOM, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s motion for amended and additional 16 findings and to amend judgment in Defendants’ favor (Dkt. No. 86). Having thoroughly 17 considered the parties’ briefing and the relevant record, the Court DENIES the motion for the 18 reasons explained herein. 19 In his amended complaint, Plaintiff, who was injured in a workplace…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Charles E. McDowell Jr. v. Arthur Calderon, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. Bright v. Bechtel Petroleum, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Crane-McNab v. County of MercedDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API