Legal Opinion

People v. Schad

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1891PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from court of sessions, Niagara county. Charles H. Schad was convicted of a felony, and appeals from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtDwight, P. J.

The specification in the notice of appeal, of the order denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial, was unnecessary, since the statute provides that upon an appeal from the judgment the decision of the court on the motion for a new trial may be reviewed. Code Crim. Proc. §§ 485, 517. The conviction was of a felony, and the judgment pronounced was of imprisonment in the state-prison for the term of five years and eight months. The motion for a new trial was on the ground of misbehavior of the jury. The facts, in this respect, conceded to be true, are that after the jury had retired to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. DouglassNew York Supreme Court · 1825
  2. Gale v. BarnesNew York Supreme Court · 1823

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. . PrioriNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Young v. Atlantic Avenue RailroadNew York City Court · 1894
  3. Hanrahan v. AyresSuperior Court of Buffalo · 1894
  4. People v. PscherhoferNew York Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Crouch v. MollNew York Supreme Court · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API