Legal Opinion
Goodman v. Archbishop Curley High School, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided February 26, 2016No. Civil Action No. RDB-15-0627PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Richard D. Bennett, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Annette Goodman ■ (“Plaintiff’ or “Goodman”) has, -brought this action against Defendants. Archbishop Curley High School, Inc. (“Curley”) and the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Baltimore (“Archdiocese”) (collectively “Defendants”), alleging retaliation in'violation of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1681 et seq. (“Title IX”) and 34 C.F.R. § 100.7. Currently pending before this Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss' or, in the alternative, for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 23). The parties’…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sandor Demkovich v. St. Andrew the Apostle ParishCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- Goodman v. Archbishop Curley High School, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2016
- Barber v. Baltimore Lutheran High School AssociationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021
- Buettner-Hartsoe v. Baltimore Lutheran High School AssociationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021
- Conrad v. Baltimore Lutheran High School AssociationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.