Legal Opinion

Bubb v. Brusky

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided June 11, 2008No. 2007AP619PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnyder, J.

¶ 1. Richard and Marjorie Bubb initiated a medical malpractice action against Dr. William Brusky, Dr. Xian Feng Gu, St. Agnes Hospital, and their insurers. The Bubbs contend the circuit court erred when it refused to submit the question of informed consent to the jury, effectively dismissing that portion *191of their claim and limiting the inquiry to whether Dr. Brusky and Dr. Gu were negligent in their care of Richard. The Bubbs submit that sufficient evidence supported their claim that the doctors failed to adequately inform Richard of alternate, viable treatment options and thereby prevented…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. LenarchickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Martin Ex Rel. Scoptur v. RichardsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Runjo v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
  4. Brown v. DibbellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Hannemann v. BoysonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bubb v. BruskyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Warren v. DinterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
  3. Bubb v. BruskyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
  4. Bubb v. BruskyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Hageny v. BodensteinerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API