Legal Opinion
Runjo v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided October 10, 1995No. 94-2807PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWedemeyer, P.J.
Radunka Runjo appeals from a judgment dismissing her malpractice complaint against Donald J. Chrzan, M.D. and St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company. Runjo claims that the verdict questions and jury instructions regarding damages were improperly formulated so as to be confusing and inconsistent. Because the directions contained in the verdict, when combined with certain jury instructions were confusing and inconsistent causing prejudice, we reverse and remand for a new trial. 1
I. BACKGROUND
Runjo filed a medical malpractice action against Chrzan alleging both negligence and failure to obtain…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gross v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- D.L. Ex Rel. Friederichs v. HuebnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Savina v. Wisconsin Gas Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- MacI v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
- Behning v. Star Fireworks Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. DodsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- Majorowicz v. Allied Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
- Lewis v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2000
- Anderson Ex Rel. Skow v. Alfa-Laval Agri, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
- Gumz v. Northern States Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.