State ex rel. Diebold Safe & Lock Co. v. Getchell
North Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Eddy County; Rose, J. Application by the Diebold Safe & Lock Company for writ of mandate to Fred O. Getchell, county auditor of Eddy County. Application denied. Plaintiff appeals. Mandamus is proper remedy to compel auditor to sign and deliver a warrant. Merrill on Mandamus § § 126, 121; Lachauce v. Auditor General, 43 N. W. Rep. 1005; State v. Tarpen, Auditor, 1 N. E. Rep. 209. In issuing warrants the auditor acts ministerially.
Read the full summary
Appeal from District Court, Eddy County; Rose, J. Application by the Diebold Safe & Lock Company for writ of mandate to Fred O. Getchell, county auditor of Eddy County. Application denied. Plaintiff appeals. Mandamus is proper remedy to compel auditor to sign and deliver a warrant. Merrill on Mandamus § § 126, 121; Lachauce v. Auditor General, 43 N. W. Rep. 1005; State v. Tarpen, Auditor, 1 N. E. Rep. 209. In issuing warrants the auditor acts ministerially. State v. Ames, 18 N. W. Rep. 277. The petition alleges that the cells and corridor were delivered to Eddy County. The contract was one…
1Opinion of the CourtCorliss, J.
The appeal is from an order denying relator’s application for a writ of mandamus to' compel defendant, as auditor of Eddy County, to attest and certify _ a county warrant issued by the board of county commissioners, and signed by the chairman thereof. The relator did not secure, in the first instance, an alternative writ, but applied on notice for a permanent writ.' The better and more regular practice is to obtain the alternative writ on an ex parte application. The alternative writ constitutes *245both the process and the pleading in the special proceeding. But it cannot be doubted that there…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McDonald v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Dickinson v. . City of PoughkeepsieNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Capital Bank v. School District No. 53North Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
- State ex rel. Waitt v. HillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
3Cited by16 opinions
- McDermont v. DinnieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
- Department of State Highways v. BakerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
- Northwestern Sheet & Iron Works v. County of SiouxNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
- Backhaus v. LeeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
- State ex rel. Dickson v. WilliamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.