Cross v. Cal. St. Cable Ry.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
This is an action for damages for personal injuries. The verdict of the jury was favorable to the plaintiff, and defendant appeals. The plaintiff, a teamster by occupation, and in full possession of his faculties, was engaged in hauling a heavy load of boards down a steep grade on California street in San Francisco. He put on his lock chain in order to hold back his wagon, while he walked and drove the horse. When two or three rods down the hill the lock chain broke. Defendant’s car tracks are situated upon this street. Plaintiff did not stop, or attempt to fix his lock *315chain, but proceeded…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Basler v. Sacramento Gas & Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Bailey v. Market Street Cable Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Winget v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Denver City Tramway Co. v. DoyleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917
- Kernan v. Market-Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.