Legal Opinion
Lee v. Marvel Enterprises, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 4, 2011No. 02 Civ. 8945PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Stan Lee Media, Inc. (“SLMI”) has moved presumably under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b) and 60(d)(3) to vacate the order of dismissal of April 27, 2005 (the “April 27 Order”), pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 17 and 19 to intervene and to substitute SLMI for the plaintiff Stan Lee (“Lee” or the “Plaintiff’), pursuant to Rule 15, for leave to file an amended complaint dating back to November 12, 2002, the date Lee filed his complaint, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24 to intervene in order to vacate the Court’s 2004 order…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Samuel Nemaizer, General Manager of the New York Coat, Suit, Dress, Rainwear and Allied Workers' Union I.L.G.W.U. v. Jack Baker, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Horne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Aczel v. LaboniaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir, Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Advanced Magnetics, Inc. v. Bayfront Partners, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Stan Lee Media, Inc. v. Walt Disney Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Charlot v. Ecolab, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Thomas v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Pena v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Casteel v. MaddalenaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.