Resendez v. State

OPINION

FEDERICO G. HINOJOSA, Jr., Justice.

A jury found appellant, Eustorgio Resen-dez, guilty of capital murder. The jury found mitigating circumstances, and the trial court assessed punishment at confinement for life. By two points of error, appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and complains that the trial court erred by charging the jury with matters not supported by the evidence. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Resendez and Ovidio Garcia advanced approximately 100 pounds of marihuana to Juan Hinojosa. Hinojosa, in turn, advanced the marihuana to Ruben Pifia. Pifia put…