Sabre Shipping Corporation v. American President Lines
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RYAN, District Judge:
Fourteen third-party defendants, who have settled wih plaintiff and obtained from it dismissal of the complaint without prejudice and a Covenant Not to Sue, move for summary judgment on the third party complaint. Familiarity with the claim in suit is presumed from the decision of this Court in Sabre Shipping Corp. v. American President Lines, Ltd., 285 F.Supp. 949; aff’d Japan Line, Ltd. et al. v. Sabre Shipping Corporation, 407 F.2d 173, 2nd Circuit, January 14, 1969. It is sufficient on this motion to state that the complaint charged third party plaintiffs and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. International Parts Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Halcyon Lines v. Haenn Ship Ceiling & Refitting Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Sola Electric Co. v. Jefferson Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Deitrick v. GreaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor v. Loran W. Robbins, and Allen M. DorfmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Stratton Group, Ltd. v. SprayregenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Professional Beauty Supply, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. National Beauty Supply, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. La Maur Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- Wilson P. Abraham Construction Corp. v. Texas Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.