Legal Opinion

Intoximeters, Inc. v. Younger

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 19, 1975No. Civ. 35577PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELKINGTON, J.

To reduce the incidence of accidents on the state’s highways, California in 1966 entered upon a program of testing the blood, breath or urine of motor vehicle drivers lawfully arrested for an offense committed while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. The test results were made available for use as evidence in the prosecution of such offenses. (See Veh. Code, §§ 13353, 13354.)

Thereafter the state’s Department of Public Health was directed by the Legislature to “adopt and publish such rules and regulations to be used in approving and governing the operation of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Cal. Drive-In Restaurant Assn. v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Green Trees Enterprises, Inc. v. Palm Springs Alpine Estates, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Hrnjak v. Graymar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1971
  5. City of Santa Clara v. Von RaesfeldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  2. Halbert's Lumber, Inc. v. Lucky Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. People v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Hartzell v. ConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Manriquez v. GourleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API