Legal Opinion
Dixon v. New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 1, 1999PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action to recover under the supplemental uninsured motorist (SUM) endorsement in their insurance policy issued by defendant. Plaintiff Carol R. Dixon was injured in an automobile accident on July 21, 1996, and plaintiffs gave notice to defendant on July 29, 1997 of their claim for benefits under the SUM endorsement. Defendant disclaimed coverage based on plaintiffs’ failure to provide timely notice of the SUM claim. Plaintiffs appeal from an order granting defendant’s motion for reargument and, upon reargument,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Foley v. RocheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- William P. Pahl Equipment Corp. v. KassisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance v. MancusoNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Nationwide Insurance v. MontopoliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re the Arbitration between Seasonwein & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Allstate Insurance & EarlAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Smith v. CassidyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Caldwell v. MaloneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Arbitration between Nationwide Mutual Insurance & SteberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Timpano v. New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.