Gaunt v. Lloyds America of San Antonio
District Court, W.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
• McMILLAN, District Judge.
When this case came on for trial before a jury, the pleadings instead of being read were stated by counsel, as is frequently the custom in this court. Plaintiff’s counsel stated that jurisdiction was based on diversity of citizenship, coupled with the requisite amount in controversy. No question was raised as to this matter either orally or in writing by counsel for the defendant and the case proceeded to trial before the jury.
At the conclusion of the evidence the defendant filed two motions for instructed verdicts, both of which were overruled. A verdict for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Great Southern Fire Proof Hotel Company v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Chapman v. BarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Puerto Rico v. Russell & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Thomas v. Board of Trustees of the Ohio State UniversitySupreme Court of the United States · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Thompson v. PrinceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Viasat Inc. v. Lloyd'sDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023