Goldblatt v. St. Louis Public Service Co.
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
BARRETT, Commissioner.
In this action by Mrs. Goldblatt to recover’ dámages for injuries sustained when she was a passenger on a bus a jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant. The trial court overruled her motion for a new trial and she has appealed. Mrs. Goldblatt submitted her case upon the assumption that res ipsa loquitur was applicable; in so far as material here, “that at said time and place said streetcar did then and there jerk and jolt in a sudden, unusual and violent manner, and plaintiff was thereby caused to sustain injury and damage, * * * then you are instructed that…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Harke v. HaaseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
- Lukitsch v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Orris v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1919
- Dill v. Dallas County Farmers' Exchange No. 177Supreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- Superior Ice & Coal Co. v. Belger Cartage Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wise v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1962
- Hanff v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
- Musgraves v. National Dairy Products Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- Thompson ex rel. Thompson v. C. F. Vatterott Northwest Investment Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1963