Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re the Personal Restraint of Richardson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1983No. 48192-0Published

1DissentDore, J.

(dissenting) — The majority holds that defense counsel's previous representation of a defense witness in an unrelated proceeding establishes a prima facie case of ineffective assistance of counsel requiring reversal where the trial court failed to inquire into this potential conflict of interest. I disagree.

*680In addition to the exchange between the court and counsel reported by the majority opinion, the record continues:

The Court: Mr. Denend can't act as your attorney in this matter. It would be — it would be ethically impossible for him to do that.

The Witness: Okay, I understand that.

The…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. Garland JeffersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  4. State v. RenfroWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API