Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Derber v. Skaff

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1964PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

The Fourteenth amendment to the constitution of the United States does not require the states to afford a jury trial in criminal proceedings. It follows that a state may set its own procedure for waiver of the jury trial afforded in that state. Thus petitioner’s claim that he has been confined in violation of the Fourteenth amendment has no merit. We note, however, that a stipulation made by counsel, without protest by defendant, to trial by jury of less than 12 in a federal prosecution has been deemed a sufficient waiver, immune from collateral attack on constitutional grounds.

Sec. 7, art.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Twining v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Maxwell v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. People v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Oborn v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. The People v. NovotnyIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  2. The People v. SailorIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Pulaski v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Leasure v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  5. Krueger v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API