Legal Opinion

Kyle W. Dilts v. State of Indiana

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 2015No. 15A01-1412-CR-545PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PYLE, Judge.

Statement of the Case

[1] This case is a reminder that failure to make a contemporaneous objection at the time evidence is introduced at trial will result in waiver of the issue on appeal. Indeed, an appellate claim will not be preserved upon an objection discussed or not made immediately prior to or following the admission of evidence.

[2] Kyle Dilts (“Dilts”) was charged with and convicted of the following two counts of Cftass A felony child molesting: 1 Count I for engaging in sexual intercourse with his daughter and Count II for engaging in deviate sexual conduct with that same…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Charles Stephenson v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Andrew Conley v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Wilson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kyle W. Dilts v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Amjab Salhab v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. Damoine Wilcoxson v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Hassell L. Burden v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Kevin D. Hamilton v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API