Legal Opinion

Brown v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 2010No. 11S04-0911-CR-537PublishedCited by 203 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOEHM, Justice.

We hold that a claimed error in admitting unlawfully seized evidence at trial is not preserved for appeal unless an objection was lodged at the time the evidence was offered. We also hold that such a claim, without more, does not assert fundamental error.

Facts and Procedural History

Linton police received an anonymous report that one Mark Green, the subject of a federal firearms warrant, had acquired methamphetamine from defendant Kenneth Brown. After Green was arrested, three Linton officers and a Clay County sheriff agreed to conduct a "knock and talk" investigation of Brown.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wagner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Mathews v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Jackson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Washington v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by203 opinions

  1. Charles Stephenson v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Daniel Brewington v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Tyrice J. Halliburton v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Kevin Charles Isom v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Benefield v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011

198 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API