Legal Opinion

Ragsdale v. Parrish

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1880No. 7503PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Shelby Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, C. J.

This was an action of partition, in which Mary J. Ragsdale, Charles T. Ragsdale, Armilda J. Harrell and James H. Harrell were plaintiffs, and Edmund K. Parrish was defendant.

The complaint averred that, on the 1st day of November, 1864, William G. Parrish died, being at the time the owner of an eighty-acre tract of land in Shelby county and the east half of lot'No. 10, on Hendricks street, in the city of Shelbyville, in the same county, and leaving as his children, by his first marriage, Edmund F. Parrish, Eli K. Parrish, James F. Parrish,William W. Parrish and Armilda J. Parrish, now Armilda…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Parsons v. MilfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Lindsay v. LindsayIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Armstrong v. BerremanIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Dale v. BartleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nagle v. HirschIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. O'Harrow v. WhitneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Sperry v. DickinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Collins v. CollinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Stotsenburg v. SameIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API