Legal Opinion

Sperry v. Dickinson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1882No. 9227PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Steuben Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bicknell, C. C.

This was an action by the assignees of a mortgage to foreclose it. The appellees Julia Dickinson and Emma E. Dickinson were the. plaintiffs.

The complaint stated that the defendants Sperry and wife mortgaged the land to Arnold to secure its purchase-money, which was embraced in eleven notes for $500 each, and one note for $1,000, all executed by Mrs. Sperry and payable to Arnold, the first one in 1875, and the others in succession annually thereafter, except the note for $1,000, which was payable in 1877; that the first three of the notes had been paid, the fourth paid in part,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jackson Township v. BarnesIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Hubble v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Belton v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Brick v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Graham v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Home Insurance v. GilmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Albright v. McTigheU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee · 1892
  3. Kelley v. KelleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Tracey v. CrepinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Frazer v. CliffordIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API