Legal Opinion

King v. Floding

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 26, 1916No. 6722, 6723PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action for damages; from city court of Atlanta — Judge Reid. May 5, 1915.

1Opinion of the CourtWade, C. J.

1. As a general rule, a parent may recover damages for an injury to his minor child in the course of the child’s employment, when he was employed without the parent’s consent, even if there be no negligence on the part of the employer. See Braswell v. Garfield Cotton Oil Mill Co., 7 Ga. App. 167 (66 S. E. 539), and cases cited in note in 30 L. R. A. (N. S.) 311. The consent of the parent to the employment of the child may, however, be inferred from his knowledge of such employment and his acquiescence therein. In this case the child, who was nearly 17 years old, himself made the contract to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Braswell v. Garfield Cotton Oil Mill Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  2. Tennessee C. I. & R. R. v. CrotwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  3. Warrior Mfg. Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  4. Davis v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1834

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Folds v. PennCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  2. Hale v. DaviesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API