Legal Opinion
Ralston v. Karp Metal Products Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 17, 1942PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The plaintiff has instituted this action to recover from his former employer unpaid overtime compensation and reasonable counsel fees allegedly due Mm pursuant to the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, also known as the Wage and Hour Law (52 U. S. Stat. 1060; U. S. Code, tit. 29, § 201 et seq.), and for other relief. His claim has been subdivided into four periods: (1) October 24, 1938, to March 12, 1939; (2) March 12, 1939, to October 24, 1939; (3) October 24,1939, to October 24,1940; and (4) March 19,1941, to June 4, 1941.
Under the Act, employees working more than a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Emerson v. Mary Lincoln Candies, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Lowrimoore v. Union Bag & Paper CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1939
- Brown v. Carter Drilling Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1941
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cotton v. Weyerhaeuser Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1944
- Toppin v. 12 East 22nd Street Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1944
- Stewart v. Mabee Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1944