Legal Opinion

D'EWART v. Neibauer

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1987No. 86-566PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Weber

Plaintiff Tina D’Ewart filed an action for declaratory judgment in the District Court of the Twelfth Judicial District, Hill County. The District Court held that Section 46.10.512, A.R.M., was invalid as applied to the plaintiff, holding accrued but unpaid child care costs could be claimed as deductions from gross income when figuring AFDC payments. The Hill County Welfare Department and the Montana Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services (SRS) appeal. We reverse and remand.

The issue is:

Can the AFDC child care deduction found in Section 46.10.512, A.R.M., be applied to child care…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Department of Revenue v. Puget Sound Power & Light Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Montana Power Co. v. Montana Public Service CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Norfolk Holdings, Inc. v. Montana Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Coppola v. FultonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  4. ACORN v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Clark Fork Coalition v. Montana WelMontana Supreme Court · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API