Legal Opinion

Williams v. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 24, 1892PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Railroad. Foreign corporation. Yenue. Remedy. * Statutory law. Before Judge Yan Epps. City court of Atlanta.

1Opinion of the Court

Simmons, Justice.

The cause of action was personal injuries from the running of the defendant’s trains in the county of Paulding in this State; the action was brought in the county of Fulton and in the city court of Atlanta. The plea to the jurisdiction was to the effect that the defendant was a foreign corporation, and in this State could be sued only in the county in which the cause of action originated, jurisdiction in that county being admitted to exist under the statute which declares that “ all railroad companies shall be liable to be sued in any. county in which the cause of action…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SchollenbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Railroad Co. v. KoontzSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Railroad Company v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. City Fire Insurance v. CarrugiSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871
  5. Balt. & Ohio R. R. v. Noell's adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1879

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Pyron & Son v. RuohsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Swift & Company v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  4. Hirsch v. Shepherd Lumber Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API