Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 5, 1990No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment modified on the law and as modified affirmed, in accordance with the following memorandum: The evidence at trial was legally insufficient to sustain defendant’s conviction for robbery in the first degree. In order to sustain a conviction for robbery in any *880degree, it must be shown that, in the course of committing a larceny, defendant used or threatened the immediate use of physical force upon another person for the purpose of either preventing or overcoming resistance to the taking of the property or the retention thereof or for the purpose of compelling the owner to deliver up the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. ChessmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. People v. LopezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  3. People v. NixonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. People v. ChessmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Betancourt v. StrohmNew York Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. People v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API