Legal Opinion

People v. Chessman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 29, 1981PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The appeal should be dismissed.

The Appellate Division (p 195), after stating its primary reason for reversal, said: “this error was further compounded by the court’s total failure * * * to marshal the evidence”. In view of the fact that this latter point had not been preserved for review, the court’s determination was necessarily predicated at least in part upon an exercise of discretion and thus is not appealable to this court (see People v Dercole, 52 NY2d 956; 957; People v Johnson, 47 NY2d 124, 126). This is so despite the fact that the primary basis for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. DercoleNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. BaskervilleNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. People v. NixonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. People v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. People v. FlynnNew York Supreme Court · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API