Legal Opinion
United States v. Newman
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided May 13, 2003No. CR02-965PHXROSPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SILVER, District Judge.
Defendant Billy Ray Newman (“Newman”) alleges that his Fourth Amendment rights were violated when his arresting officer arrested and searched him without probable cause. Newman moves to suppress the results of this allegedly illegal search. For the reasons given below, the Court grants the Motion.
BACKGROUND
On September 24, 2002, the grand jury returned a three count Indictment against Newman as follows: Count 1, felon in possession of a firearm on June 14, 2002, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1); Count 2, possession of methamphetamine with the intent to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- George Thomas Franklin v. Jim Fox Martin Murray Robert Morse Bryan Cassandro John Cuneo, Sergeant Eileen Franklin-LipskerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Evans v. City of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2012
- United States v. RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Velazco-DurazoDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2005
- Gary Michael Higby v. Placer County, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.