Legal Opinion

Piernas v. La Salle Realty Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 2, 1931No. 27428PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.

Louis Piernas, the appellee, in 1921 owned two adjoining pieces of property fronting on Bertrand street, in the city of New Orleans. He acquired one piece on February 13, 1917, by purchase from the succession of Julia Eseot, and he acquired the other piece on August 5, 1920, by purchase from Mrs. William Cassidy. Both parcels comprised the whole of the original lot No. 9, and were designated on the assessment rolls of New Orleans for the year 1920 by the same number and by the same measurements.

The property which Piernas purchased from Mrs. William Cassidy was sold on October 3,1921, in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kivlen v. HorvathSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  2. Recker v. DupuySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  3. Succession of Williams v. ChaplainSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  4. Ryals v. ToddSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  5. Fennimore v. BoatnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Constance v. SudwischerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
  2. Barthold v. DoverLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Mire v. La Salle Realty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  4. Robertson v. PolmerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Salsman v. BloomSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API