Legal Opinion

Salsman v. Bloom

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 2, 1931No. 30710PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOverton, J.

Robert S. Salsman and John E. Martin owned in indivisión three lots of ground, lying in the city of New Orleans, which they acquired in the year 1915. The property is vacant property. Both the state and city taxes were paid on the property promptly, each year, except the city taxes for the year 1922, which there was a failure to pay. This failure resulted in the sale of the property for the taxes, due the city for the year 1922, the defendant Joseph A. Bloom becoming the purchaser thereof. The deed was executed on October 23,1923, and was duly registered in the conveyance records of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Recker v. DupuySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  2. Jones v. CurranSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  3. Wilkerson v. WycheSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  4. Piernas v. La Salle Realty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Constance v. SudwischerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
  2. Sheridan v. Commercial Guaranty & Brokerage Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Robinson v. MafrigeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  4. Sanders v. AbbittLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Bunch v. BoyetLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API