In re Osborn
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.
After somewhat protracted and comparatively fruitless litigation, the trustee rendered an intermediate account. There were objections by one claiming to be a contingent remainderman. After a hearing before an official referee, the account was approved. At Special Term the order, among other things, confirmed the report of the referee. The appeal is from that order.
On January 24, 1928, Charles E. Osborn and his wife, Helen, entered into a trust agreement with the respondent bank (under a different name) as trustee. Both of the settlors of the trust contributed to the trust estate, which…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wendt v. FischerNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Costello v. . CostelloNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Pyle v. PyleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Pyle v. . PyleNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re the Accounting of First Trust & Deposit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
- In Re Lloyd's American Trust Fund LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Newhoff v. Rankow, Cohen & Isaac, P. C.New York Surrogate's Court · 1980
- MurraySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1946
- Wiesner v. Romo Paper Products Corp. Employees' Retirement PlanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.