Legal Opinion
Hill City Ry. Co. v. Youngquist
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided April 23, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
This is a bill in equity seeking to restrain the defendants and each of them from in any way interfering with plaintiff’s proposed abandonment of its line of railroad and the surrender of its franchise; also seeking to restrain defendants and each of them from taking steps to enforce against plaintiff any penalties for making such abandonment, and especially the penalties prescribed by sections 4709 and 4714, General Statutes Minn. 1923.
The present hearing is upon an application by plaintiff, duly made to a court of three judges duly constituted under section 266, Judicial Code (28 USCA §…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Siler v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Washington Ex Rel. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co. v. FairchildSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Gilchrist v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Railroad Commission of Texas v. Eastern Texas RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Free-Flow Muffler Company v. KliewerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Free-Flow Muffler Company v. KliewerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955