Legal Opinion

Wingfoot California Homes Co. v. Valley Nat. Bank

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1952No. 5625PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DE CONCINI, Justice.

The plaintiff, Valley National Bank, appellee herein, on June 26, 1951, filed a verified complaint against defendant, appellant, Wingfoot California Homes Co., praying for a money judgment and for foreclosure of certain mortgages. These mortgages were on 43 lots in Chandler, Arizona, where the defendant had constructed a housing development known as Wingfoot Gardens. A copy of the complaint and summons, together with an order to show cause why a receiver should not be appointed, was served on the defendant. The defendant made no response to the order to show cause but was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Baker v. VarneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Hastings v. WiseMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Broad & Market National Bank v. LarsenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1917
  4. Lewis v. ShawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. PuckettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Federal Home Life Insurance v. American Continental Corp. (In Re American Continental Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 1989
  2. The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Fifty AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  3. Bank of Hawaii v. Kepaoa Development Corp.High Court of American Samoa · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API