Legal Opinion

Rizo v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)

Decided February 5, 1998No. 11-97-132-CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ARNOT, Chief Justice.

The issue on appeal is whether a 1992 conviction for driving while intoxicated, where the imposition of the sentence was suspended and the defendant was placed on community supervision, is a “final” conviction for purposes of enhancement under TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 49.09 (Vernon Supp. 1998) in the trial of a subsequent driving while intoxicated offense. We hold that it is under the special enhancement provisions for operating while intoxicated offenses.

The jury convicted appellant of driving while intoxicated as a second offense. 1 The trial court assessed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. Mosqueda v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. State v. Kindred, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Williamson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2001
  2. In Re State Ex Rel. Hilbig, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  3. State v. VerhoevenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
  4. Joseph Glen Willis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2003
  5. Rae, Ex Parte Russell BoydCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API