Curtis B. Braatz v. Parsons Electric Company and Zurich North America/GAB Robins, Inc., Relators.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILDEA, Chief Justice.
Relators Parsons Electric Company and Zurich North America/GAB Robins, Inc. (“Parsons”) seek review of a Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals decision upholding a compensation judge’s attorney fee award. Parsons argues that to be eligible for attorney fees, Minn.Stat. § 176.081 (2012) requires the employee to address all related issues at the same time. 1 Thus, Parsons contends that when the employee decided not to pursue his indemnity claims at the compensation hearing, and instead pursued only a claim for medical benefits, the employee forfeited his statutory…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Gillette v. Harold, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Irwin v. Surdyk's LiquorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Joyce v. Lewis Bolt & Nut Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- James Jurgensen, Relator, vs. Dave Perkins Contracting, Inc., and TBG Claims Services, RespondentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2025