Legal Opinion

Curtis B. Braatz v. Parsons Electric Company and Zurich North America/GAB Robins, Inc., Relators.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 23, 2014No. A13-2320PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILDEA, Chief Justice.

Relators Parsons Electric Company and Zurich North America/GAB Robins, Inc. (“Parsons”) seek review of a Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals decision upholding a compensation judge’s attorney fee award. Parsons argues that to be eligible for attorney fees, Minn.Stat. § 176.081 (2012) requires the employee to address all related issues at the same time. 1 Thus, Parsons contends that when the employee decided not to pursue his indemnity claims at the compensation hearing, and instead pursued only a claim for medical benefits, the employee forfeited his statutory…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  3. Gillette v. Harold, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. Irwin v. Surdyk's LiquorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  5. Joyce v. Lewis Bolt & Nut Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. James Jurgensen, Relator, vs. Dave Perkins Contracting, Inc., and TBG Claims Services, RespondentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API