Legal Opinion

People v. Curtis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 28, 2001No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant was convicted following a jury trial of burglary in the third degree (Penal Law § 140.20), petit larceny (Penal Law § 155.25), and making a punishable false written statement (Penal Law § 210.45). The conviction of making a punishable false written statement arises out of a statement that defendant made to the police in which he denied any involvement in the burglary or larceny. Following a pretrial Huntley hearing, County Court found that the statement, although…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. People v. DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. People v. MaerlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. People v. StromanNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. People v. HooperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. PotterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. People v. CurtisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. People v. PercerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Curtis v. FischerDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API