Legal Opinion

Geletucha v. 222 Delaware Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 4, 1959PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff has sued defendants 222 Delaware Corp. and 1 Hour Dura Cleaning, Inc., and two others, in negligence because of the death of her intestate. We have before us only an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits as against 1 Hour Dura Cleaning, Inc., based on an order of the court made at the close of all of the testimony.

Plaintiff’s intestate died as the result of asphyxiation from fumes of a chemical known as perchloroethylene used by 222 Delaware Corp. (which we shall call “ Delaware ”) in its retail cleaning establishment. The action is founded in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commerce Trust Co. v. WoodburyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  2. Deno v. Standard Furniture Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Mangan v. Terminal Transportation System, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1935
  4. In re Belt-Modes, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950
  5. Horan v. John F. Trommer, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Hallam Enterprises, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Mull v. Colt Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  3. Shields v. County of DelawareAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API