Legal Opinion

Aidroos v. Vance Uniformed Protection Services, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 31, 2008No. 1—06—2009, 1—06—2126 consPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Mara Frossard

In this consolidated action involving claims for negligence, wrongful death, and survival damages, the trial court granted summary-judgment in favor of defendants Vance Uniformed Protection Services, Inc. (Vance), and Latessa Diamond. Plaintiffs appealed, contending defendants had a duty to protect against criminal conduct where defendants contracted to provide security services. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

BACKGROUND

This case arose from the shooting deaths and injuries that occurred at Navistar International Transportation Corp. and International Truck and Engine Corp.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Purtill v. HessIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Loyola Academy v. S & S Roof Maintenance, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Pippin v. Chicago Housing AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Frye v. Medicare-Glaser Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Iseberg v. GrossIllinois Supreme Court · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Krywin v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  2. Doe v. Kane Cnty.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. McKenna v. AlliedBarton Security Services, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  4. Blankenship v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  5. Doe I v. Kane CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API